Ember USDC
Network · EthereumAsset · USDCHilbert Overcollateralized LendingHigh risk 4.9
Rate history is not available for this pool.
An estimate of the share of a deposit that could be lost over a year and of how likely a loss is. Smart Deposit strategies admit a pool only when these estimates are within their limits.
Model risk-el-v1. The estimates are statistical and rest on past incidents. They are not a guarantee: a pool with low estimates can lose value, including its full amount.
Ember pool on Ethereum. Category: RWA. LIQUMO rates the pool on the data published by DeFiLlama and the protocol.
Pools of the same class with at least $10M TVL.
High risk: 4.9 out of 10. What raises the risk: only $2.1M in the pool; no audit reports are published. What lowers the risk: no incidents recorded for the protocol; deposit in the USDC stablecoin: fiat-backed. The score is set by the factor “Liquidity depth”.
The score is set by: Liquidity depth
On-chain data is shown for pools where LIQUMO executes deposits.
Each link can become a source of loss; the shorter the chain, the fewer such links.
The final score is the highest of three values.
Levels: low risk up to 2.5, medium up to 4.5, high up to 6.0, very high above 6.0.
Higher risk than 64% of 61 similar pools (USDC, Ethereum)
The score follows LIQUMO’s own methodology: 11 risk factors and data from 4 types of sources. Data is refreshed every 5 minutes.
A risk score is not investment advice; the decision to deposit is yours.
Ask the AI assistant about this riskMethodology risk-v1. Sources: DeFiLlama, Yearn yDaemon, Morpho API. Data as of .